| 摘要: |
| 传统村落是城市建设工作中历史文化保护传承的重要主体。城市更新背景下，传统村落的保护工作与城市中的历史文化保护工作需共同推进，充分发挥
传统村落中蕴含的非物质文化遗产的社会功能与当代价值。传统村落中的建筑及村落的格局、肌理等物质形态，是其非物质文化的重要载体，因此，保护非物质
文化遗产及其依存的文化生态，是传统村落保护、利用与传承的关键。以广州市小洲村为例，将共生理论应用于设计实践，挖掘村落历史空间肌理，总结传统文
化景观现状，探析历史文化名城中传统村落的保护困境。通过对小洲村北部入口地段中民居、公共空间和建筑空间肌理的改造，营建契合岭南水乡风貌的景观，
强化地段特色；以人的需求为核心，通过维护村落邻里关系，修复传统人文生态，活化利用村落与市区的共享资源。小洲村北部地段的改造实现了对历史文化名
城中传统村落的系统性保护，同时验证了对传统村落物质文化的保护可延伸作用到对非物质文化的保护工作中，可为同类村落保护和更新项目提供参考和借鉴。 |
| 关键词: 风景园林 城市更新 传统村落保护 小洲村改造 共生理论 |
| DOI：10.19775/j.cla.2025.03.0060 |
| 投稿时间：2024-03-13修订日期：2024-12-10 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Research on Traditional Village Protection Based on Symbiosis Theory in the Context of UrbanRenewal: Taking the Renovation Project of Xiaozhou Village in Guangzhou as an Example |
| WU Bin,,LIU Xinting*,FANG Bonan,HU Linlin,SUN Yuchao |
| Abstract: |
| Under the background of urban renewal, traditional villages are
important subjects of historical and cultural protection and inheritance during
the work of urban construction. In the meantime, the protection of traditional
villages and the protection of historical culture in cities need to be promoted
together in order to give the full play role to the social function and contemporary
value of the intangible cultural heritage contained in traditional villages. While
protecting the material cultural heritage of the village, the intangible cultural
heritage contained in traditional villages also needs continuous attention and
maintenance. Material forms such as architecture and traditional pattern
mechanism in traditional villages are important carriers of non-material culture
in villages, therefore, protecting the traditional intangible cultural heritage and
its dependent cultural ecology is the key to the protection, utilization, and
inheritance of traditional villages. The preservation and inheritance of historical
culture is an important task in urban renewal, and the preservation and
inheritance of historical culture is the premise of urban renewal. The Ministry of
Housing and Urban-Rural Development and other ministries and commissions
have always adhered to the core principle of "protection first, utilization based
and inheritance based" in the continuous high-quality promotion of protection
work. With the development of urbanization, the protection of traditional villages
lack of not systematic from macro to micro, but urban and rural areas are
developing themselves independently, the protection work without treating urban
and rural areas as an organic whole and systematically protecting them from top
to bottom and from the inside out. However, the protection and development
of traditional villages depend on the support of urban resources. To this end,
many village protection methods only create culture and tourism to promote
development, and attract resources from the city, however, this approach
cannot fundamentally solve the contradictory proposition of village protection,
inheritance, and parallel development. This kind of "quasi-urban" construction is
one of the reasons for the decline of intangible culture in traditional villages, new
buildings have problems such as chaotic style and poor construction quality,
which destroy the historical texture, spatial scale and landscape environment of
the village, leading to the protection of material and cultural relics of traditional
villages. Although the construction of "quasi-urban" reflects the needs of villagers
for modern life, it is the reasonable demand of people inside the village. In recent
years, most urban residents have the need of "returning their hometown", which
is the demand of people outside the village. When cities and villages share
resources, they should give priority to coordinating the needs of their people,
and use this as a connecting point to become interdependent and mutually
beneficial. Taking Xiaozhou Village of Guangzhou as an example, the symbiosis
theory was applied to design practice, the historical spatial texture of the village
and the current situation of the traditional cultural landscape were excavated,
and the dilemma of the protection of traditional villages in the historical and
cultural cities was studied. Through the transformation of folk houses, public
space, and architectural space texture in the northern entrance area of Xiaozhou
Village, the landscape that fits the style of Lingnan water village is built, and the
sense of location identification is strengthened. The renovation plan focuses on
the needs of people, restores the traditional human ecology by protecting the
village neighborhood, and activates the shared resources between the village
and the urban area. The renovation of the northern part of Xiaozhou Village has
realized the systematic protection of traditional villages in the famous historical
and cultural city. At the same time, it has verified that the protection of material
culture of traditional villages can be extended to the protection of intangible
culture, giving full play to the social functions and contemporary values of
traditional culture, and providing reference for the protection and renewal
projects of similar villages. |
| Key words: landscape architecture urban renewal traditional village protection renovation of Xiaozhou village symbiosis theory |
