| 摘要: |
| 尝试以“镜像”这一长久以来不断被讨论的议题作
为评论路径，通过相关历史理论梳理，归纳出“镜像”这一
学术议题在不同研究语境下的特征。之后通过图纸还原、访
谈设计师本人和现场体验等方法，分别对朱育帆的3个景观
作品——九寨景区经幡广场、柏林IGA独乐园、青海原子城
纪念园和平之丘中出现的镜像设计进行设计还原和理论识别
(theoretical identification)。通过对这3个作品的读解，分
别构建出九寨经幡广场的结构之镜、IGA独乐园的隐匿之镜、
原子城和平之丘的想象之镜3种镜像设计方法。在此基础之
上，进一步辨别这3种镜像之间的共同点与分异点。本次设计
评论的目的有二：1)溯源镜像作为一种普遍类型设计方法的发
展与演变；2)试图揭示镜像作为一种特定风景园林设计方法其
背后的设计潜质与价值。 |
| 关键词: 风景园林 镜像 设计评论 真与幻 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Three Mirrors: Truth and Illusion in the DesignedLandscape Works of Zhu Yufan |
| CAO Kaizhong,YANG Sen |
| Abstract: |
| This essay attempts to take "mirror", an issue discussed
long ago, as a route of criticism. Through examing relevant history
and theories, restoration of the drawings, interview with the designer
himself, filedwork and other methods, the mirrors in Zhu Yufan's three
landscape works - Jingfan Square in Jiuzhai Valley Nature Reserve,
Berlin IGA Dule Yuan Garden and Peace Hill in Qinghai Atomic City
Memorial Park are respectively criticized and theoretically identified.
After reviewing the three works, the Mirror of Appearance in Jingfan
Square, the Mirror of Hiddening in IGA Dule Yuan Garden, and the
Mirror of Imagination in Peace Hill of Qinghai Atomic City, will be
summarized, respectively. On this basis, these three mirror's common
points and differences are recognized. The purpose is twofold: first, to
trace the development and evolution of mirror as a universal design
strategy, and second, to revel the potential and values behind mirror
as a specfic landscape degisn method. |
| Key words: landscape architecture mirror criticism for designed
landscape truth and illusion |
